Weather Ελληνικά Sign in
Home › Article

Peach diseases and pests: identification from symptoms, with a diagnostic tool

Peach
Ripe peaches free of blemishes and pest damage
Fruit of marketable grade. What separates this picture from a second-grade crop is rarely one large epidemic — it is three or four small problems that were not identified in time.

Savvas Pastopoulos, Agronomist MSc — Pastopoulos Agronomics, Neos Mylotopos, Pella, Greece

In peach, damage rarely comes from a single cause. Brown rot, scab, peach twig borer and oriental fruit moth work on the same fruit, one attack often opens the door for the next, and a single sign — a drop of gum, a sunken lesion, a wilted shoot — is produced by four different things. What follows covers the pests and diseases of the crop with the emphasis on telling them apart: not what exists, but how one is distinguished from another in the field, with a diagnostic tool that compares observed symptoms against the profiles of thirty-three causes.

The biggest mistake in peach diagnosis Treating gum as a disease. Gum is not a pathogen and it is not a diagnosis — it is the tree's general response to injury. The same exudate comes from bacterial canker, from fungal gummosis, from Phytophthora crown rot, from an insect gallery, from sunburn, from frost and from a stake tie left too tight. The diagnostic element is not the gum, but what lies underneath it once the bark is cut away.
70 / 33 / 362degree-days to first capture of peach twig borer, oriental fruit moth and summer fruit tortrix in orchards in Pella, northern Greece [3]
40–70days from infection to visible scab symptoms on the fruit [2]
3–6years after planting to sudden collapse in peach tree short life [2]
33causes in the diagnostic tool

1. What makes peach a special case

Peach is a deciduous tree with very large annual growth, thin bark, and fruit that ripens through the summer. Each of these three traits changes the way an attack is read.

First, the inoculum overwinters on the tree, not in the soil. Peach leaf curl overwinters as conidia on the surface of the twigs and on bud scales [1]. Scab overwinters in lesions on the shoots, and those lesions are the only source of the conidia that will infect the fruit in spring [2]. Brown rot overwinters in mummified fruit and in twig cankers [1]. Peach twig borer overwinters as a first- or second-instar larva inside a tiny cell in crotches and pruning wounds [6]. In practice this means that winter clean-up of the canopy is not an accessory to plant protection but a part of it: whatever remains on the tree in February is the inoculum of May.

Second, the time between infection and symptom is enormous in certain diseases. With scab, symptoms on the fruit become visible 40 to 70 days after the conidia are deposited [2] — roughly six to seven weeks after petal fall [15]. By the time the black velvety spots appear on the fruit, the spray that would have prevented them was due six weeks earlier. Identification in peach is never only "what can be seen today" but "what the weather did in April".

Third, the same visible sign is produced by different causes, and the distinction is decided at the scale of millimetres. The larva of the peach twig borer enters the fruit at the stem end or along the suture and feeds just under the skin. The larva of the oriental fruit moth also generally enters at the stem end, but bores to the centre and feeds around the pit [5] [6]. One cut with a knife separates the two insects, and the separation matters because their flights do not coincide.

Fourth — and this is the most underrated point — many of the most serious problems of peach are not primary pathogens. Bacterial canker is a weak pathogen that requires predisposing factors, the most important being ring nematode [1]. Fungal gummosis attacks trees predisposed by stress [1]. Capnodis prefers weakened trees [10]. Wood-decay fungi are an indicator, not a killer. In all these cases, "what do I spray" is the wrong question; the right one is "what is stressing this tree".

Sources: 1 2 5 6 10 15

2. The identification tool

The tool compares the selected symptoms against the profiles of thirty-three pathogens, pests and physiological disorders of peach. It does not work by simple tallying of matches: each symptom carries a different weight according to how distinctive it is. White mycelial fans under the bark count for far more than general chlorosis, because the latter fits twelve causes.

Certain symptoms also count negatively. Damage on scattered individual trees, unrelated to the low spots of the block, speaks for Verticillium wilt and Armillaria and against Phytophthora, which works in patches where water stands. Without negative weights the tool does not diagnose — it merely agrees with whatever is selected.

Before using the tool Identification from symptoms is probabilistic, not certain. Different causes produce almost identical pictures, particularly at early stages. Symptoms change with cultivar, tree age, rootstock and season. Two problems can and often do coexist on the same tree — brown rot follows the oriental fruit moth's entry hole, gummosis follows sunburn. For regulated organisms such as plum pox virus, diagnosis is made only by the competent plant health authority, with laboratory confirmation.
Identification from symptoms

Select the organ, then select every symptom observed. Results update automatically.

1. Where the problem is seen
2. What exactly is visible
    How to read the percentage The percentage shows how much of the selected evidence each cause explains, weighted by how distinctive each symptom is. It is not a probability. 100% means the cause explains everything that was selected, not that the diagnosis is certain — with a single symptom selected, 100% says almost nothing. Two results with close percentages mean the symptoms do not yet separate them: what is needed is the distinguishing feature given on each card, and very often a cut with a knife.

    Sources: 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 10 11 13 14

    3. Fungi of the blossoms, foliage and fruit

    Brown rot

    The most serious fungal disease of stone fruit worldwide. In Europe Monilinia fructigena predominates, while M. laxa is also widespread; M. fructicola is mainly Asian and American in distribution but has spread [1]. The fungus overwinters in mummified fruit — on the tree or on the orchard floor — and in twig cankers [1].

    Three figures govern management. Blossom infection takes place within 6 to 12 hours at 15 to 20 °C; after 3 to 5 days the blossom is blighted [2]. The temperature range permitting infection is wide, with an optimum of 22.5 to 25 °C, and the minimum wetness duration is 3 to 5 hours at 20 °C, whereas at 10 °C 18 hours are required [2]. On ripe fruit under optimum conditions, decay becomes visible within 48 hours of infection [2].

    Brown rot on ripe peaches with grey sporodochia
    Brown rot on ripe peaches. The critical detail is not the decay but the transmission by simple contact: one rotten fruit infects its neighbours inside the crate, and at 25 °C that takes two days.

    The diagnostic feature on the blossoms is that they remain firmly attached to the spur instead of falling, with a gum drop where the peduncle joins the stem [2]. This separates brown rot from frost, which drops the killed blossoms. On the fruit the decay is firm and expands rapidly, with greyish sporodochia arranged in concentric rings.

    Brown rot is covered in full in the separate article on brown rot of stone fruit, with the critical spray windows and resistance management.

    Peach leaf curl

    Taphrina deformans produces the most recognisable picture in the crop: leaves thickened, wrinkled and distorted, reddish or yellowish in colour and finally carrying a subtle white layer of asci on the surface [2]. Infections occur at 10 to 21 °C and are favoured by cool wet weather during bud development; when temperatures at early leaf development are high, infection rarely becomes established [2].

    Young peach shoots with thickened reddish curled leaves
    The first appearance of leaf curl, long before the classic "curled" form: the young shoots already carry thickened, incurved, reddish blades. At this stage infection is long since complete — the treatment window was before bud swell.
    The rule that costs crops every year Peach leaf curl is managed with one well-timed preventative application, either in autumn after 90% of the leaves have fallen or in spring before bud swell. Treatments after infection or after symptom development are ineffective, and cultural practice offers no control [2]. Anyone who sees curled leaves in April has missed the February window.

    Shot hole

    Wilsonomyces carpophilus produces small circular leaf spots whose centres become necrotic, drop out and leave a hole — hence the name. At 20 to 25 °C leaf infection requires 8 to 12 hours of wetness, while twig infection requires at least 24 hours of continuous wetness [2]. This difference explains why in years with short rain events only foliar symptoms appear, whereas in years with prolonged rain the problem moves into the wood and becomes perennial.

    In semi-arid climates the basic treatment is a dormant one, after leaf fall and before the rains, to protect the twigs and buds [2].

    Scab — the disease that shows up when nothing can be done

    Venturia carpophila is important in areas with abundant rainfall but also in orchards under overhead irrigation, which keeps the foliage wet [2]. The fungus overwinters in superficial oval twig lesions measuring 3 × 5 to 5 × 8 mm at the end of the season; at 70 to 100% relative humidity it produces abundant conidia within 20 to 30 hours, mainly from petal fall until mid-spring [2].

    Lesions on the fruit appear on half- to full-sized fruit approximately 6 to 8 weeks after petal fall, measure 5 to 10 mm in diameter and are first green, then olive to black, often with a green to yellow halo [2]. The earliest, smaller spots reach 2 to 3 mm and appear as a rule near the stem end, with a raised corky appearance [19].

    Why scab costs twice in clingstone cultivars Beyond the downgrading of appearance, the skin of infected fruit does not slip off easily when dipped in hot water before canning or freezing; for that reason only clean fruit should be selected for processing [15]. In a region of clingstone canning cultivars, this turns a cosmetic problem into a rejected consignment.

    The same disease on apricot, with its own peculiarities, is covered in a separate article, available in Greek only.

    Furthermore, when infection is severe the skin cracks, and the crack becomes an entry point for brown rot [19]. That sequence — scab in May, brown rot in July — is frequently attributed in its entirety to brown rot, and the following season is met with the wrong programme.

    Powdery mildew

    Podosphaera pannosa causes damage mainly on green fruit [1]. Conidia germinate between 2 and 37 °C with an optimum of 21 °C and — unlike every other fungus in this list — prolonged wetness kills powdery mildew conidia [2]. In practice, powdery mildew is the disease of the dry warm spring, while all the others are diseases of the wet one.

    One identification trap: the "rusty spot" lesion on peach may be caused by Podosphaera leucotricha, that is by the powdery mildew of apple, where neighbouring apple trees are present [1]. In mixed plantings, the neighbourhood is part of the diagnosis.

    Rust

    Tranzschelia discolor produces angular yellow lesions on the upper leaf surface and corresponding rusty-brown pustules on the lower one [2]. Urediniospores germinate over a range of 8 to 38 °C, with an optimum of 13 to 26 °C, and require wetness or a saturated atmosphere. At 20 °C, 18 hours of wetness are needed for adequate leaf infection [2]. Spore germination begins within 4 hours, but appressoria form over the stomata 18 hours after inoculation — which is why short rain events are not enough [2].

    Peach leaves with dense yellow rust lesions
    Rust lesions on the upper surface. The density on the right-hand leaf shows how quickly the photosynthetic surface closes down once wetness hours coincide with suitable temperatures.

    An important detail for timing: the fungus overwinters as mycelium in stem lesions, and the emergence of sporulating stem lesions in spring has been used as the starting date for the spray programme [2]. Watching the wood, not the leaves, gives the timing.

    The cost of rust is not this year's crop but next year's. Premature defoliation forces the tree to live on reserves, depletes the resources available for bud differentiation, and defoliated trees often flower in autumn, wasting flower buds. In addition, bare scaffolds are exposed to direct solar radiation, become sunscalded and are then colonised by wood-rotting fungi [13]. That chain is the reason why rust, without causing visible damage to the current crop, empties orchards over three years.

    Anthracnose

    Caused by Colletotrichum species — mainly of the C. gloeosporioides and C. acutatum complexes — and appearing in areas and seasons with high rainfall and warm temperatures during ripening [2]. Lesions are circular, brown or salmon-pink, firm and slightly sunken.

    The genuinely diagnostic element is the cut: the lesion is cone-shaped in cross-section, hardened, and separates easily from the healthy mesocarp [2]. On the surface the acervuli are arranged in concentric rings. Brown rot, by contrast, neither separates nor forms a cone.

    Sources: 1 2 13 15 19

    4. Bacterial diseases

    Bacterial spot

    Xanthomonas arboricola pv. pruni overwinters in cankers, buds, bark cracks and leaf scars [1]. It is favoured by rain and humidity, but the factor that makes it destructive is wind: heavy rainfall with wind drives the bacterium into leaves, fruit and stems, and the disease is distinctly more severe on the windward side of the tree [2]. The uneven distribution within a single tree is itself diagnostic.

    It is favoured by temperatures of 19 to 28 °C and high humidity, while hot dry conditions inhibit spread [2]. On leaves the lesions are angular, delimited by the veins, water-soaked at first and later dark; on fruit they form small sunken lesions that crack and exude gum.

    Two practical criteria for separation, from the classic illustrated identification guide for the crop [16]. On the leaves: bacterial spot lesions are angular and do not cross the larger veins, unlike chemical injury, which does. On the fruit: bacterial spot lesions are deep cracks, whereas scab lesions are strictly superficial. These two observations resolve, in the field, two of the commonest confusions in the crop.

    Peach leaves with lesions, shot-holing and intense yellowing
    Lesions with perforation of the blade and intense yellowing of the whole affected leaf, while the neighbouring leaves remain green. This selective chlorosis before abscission is the element that shot hole does not produce.

    A critical point: resistance of peach cultivars to Xap is polygenic, leaf and fruit responses are controlled by different genes, and the alleles conferring susceptibility are the more common ones [2]. In other words there is no "resistant cultivar" in the absolute sense, and a cultivar with clean leaves may have susceptible fruit.

    Bacterial canker

    Caused by Pseudomonas syringae pv. syringae and pv. morsprunorum. The primary entry point is assumed to be the leaf abscission scars in autumn, and secondarily pruning cuts [2]. Mild temperatures, 12 to 18 °C, with wet conditions favour infection, and the disease is worse in mild wet winters than in consistently cold ones [2].

    The most useful field feature is the sour odour of the bark in the canker area in spring [1]. No other cause of gummosis produces it.

    Two things change the management. First, the bacterium is a weak pathogen and requires predisposing factors; the most important is the ring nematode, Mesocriconema xenoplax [1] [2]. Second, the pathogen's tolerance to copper makes the classic copper approach questionable, and the focus shifts to limiting stress: avoiding low soil pH, avoiding nutrient deficiency, selecting the pruning date, tolerant rootstocks and management of ring nematodes [2].

    Canker with abundant gum exudation on a scaffold branch
    Canker with abundant gum exudation on a scaffold branch of sweet cherry. The picture in peach is practically identical. The diagnosis is not decided by the quantity of gum but by the discoloration and the odour beneath the bark.

    Bacterial canker of stone fruit is covered in detail, with its annual cycle and entry points, in the corresponding article.

    Peach tree short life

    Not one disease but a complex. The canopy of a tree collapses suddenly before, during or just after bloom, usually 3 to 6 years after planting; sap oozes from scaffolds and trunk, the tissue beneath the bark is discoloured and has a sour odour, and — most characteristically — the tree is killed only to the soil line, with shoots later emerging from the rootstock [2].

    The immediate causes of death are late-winter cold injury, bacterial canker, or a combination of the two. The predisposing factors are ring nematode, improper rootstock selection, the time of pruning, root injury, soil pH and structure, and replanting on land with a history of stone fruit [2]. The disease is most common in sandy soils; in clay soils, replanting gives fewer problems [2].

    The two points of the programme that cost nothing Of the ten measures in the classic management programme [2], two have no cost and apply immediately: adjusting pH to at least 6.5 before planting, and moving pruning to late winter — February and March, not early autumn. The rest — subsoiling, tolerant rootstocks, removal and burning of dead trees — carry a cost, but not a high one relative to losing a whole young block.

    Crown gall

    Agrobacterium tumefaciens produces galls on the crown and roots. Gall development is faster at temperatures above 20 °C, with visible galls in 2 to 4 weeks [2]. Survival of the bacterium is negatively affected by soil temperatures above 34 °C [2]. The disease is favoured by nematode injury [1] and by wounds made at planting — which is why it appears almost exclusively in young blocks and in nursery material.

    Crown gall tumours on the trunk base and root of a peach tree
    Galls at the base of the trunk and on the root, visible only after the tree was lifted. This is solid tissue, not decay — which is why the tree may survive for years with reduced vigour.

    Sources: 1 2 16

    5. Diseases of the wood and scaffolds

    Fungal gummosis

    Fungal gummosis is caused mainly by Botryosphaeria dothidea and related species, and appears on trees predisposed by stress [1]. The visible symptom is multiple points of gum exudation on woody shoots and scaffolds.

    Gum exudation from infection sites on a woody peach shoot
    Gum exudation from multiple points on a peach shoot. The index of severity is the number of points, not the size of each drop.

    Fungal gummosis of peach is analysed in detail in the separate article, with the three stages of the attack and the cost in yield. That article is available in Greek only.

    Constriction canker — Diaporthe amygdali

    The pathogen is known by three names, and that alone creates confusion in the literature: Diaporthe amygdali is the current name, with an anamorph formerly reported as Phomopsis amygdali and, earlier still, as Fusicoccum amygdali. It causes constriction canker and shoot blight on peach, nectarine, almond, apricot, walnut, pear and grapevine [20].

    Its distinctive feature is the entry point. Conidia infect through leaf scars in autumn, and in spring through buds, bud scale scars, blossoms and fruit scars [20]. These infections can affect up to 50% of the shoots [1]. The canker forms exactly at the node, constricts the shoot and causes it to break — hence the name.

    The figures recorded on peach, as summarised in the recent review of the pathogen's biology [20]:

    • α-conidia germinate on moist surfaces over a range of 5 to 36 °C, with an optimum of 27 to 29 °C.
    • Infection, however, is most common at 5 to 15 °C — that is, at temperatures far below the optimum for germination.
    • The incubation period, from infection to the first visible canker, is approximately one month.
    • Optimum mycelial growth lies around 24 to 25 °C, with an upper threshold of 40 °C and a lower one between 5 and 7 °C.
    • Cirrus production from the pycnidia occurs over a range of 1 to 38 °C, with the greatest proportion of pycnidia producing cirri at 17 °C, while the maximum production of conidia per pycnidium is slightly warmer, at 24 °C.
    • Canker size and the number of pycnidia per canker follow a sinusoidal pattern through the year: lowest values in late winter and early spring, maximum values in late summer and early autumn.
    Killed peach bud with a nodal canker and pycnidia in the bark
    A killed bud with the canker around it and dense black specks — the pycnidia — on the bark of the node. The canker is exactly on the node, not along the shoot: that is the feature which separates it from every other cause of dieback.
    Why these two figures together explain everything Inoculum peaks in late summer and early autumn, and infection is most common at 5 to 15 °C. The two conditions meet precisely during leaf fall, when hundreds of leaf scars open simultaneously on every shoot. That is why the critical treatment is not a spring one: it is an autumn treatment, around leaf fall [20].

    On almond, under controlled conditions, the highest infection was observed after 72 hours of wetness and the lowest after 6 hours, with the ranges for conidial germination and infection extending from 5 to 35 °C; the optimum temperature for α-conidia production within the pycnidia was approximately 22 °C [20]. These values are for almond and are given here as an order of magnitude — the same work notes explicitly that knowledge of this pathogen has come mainly from peach.

    Management rests on preventative treatments before flowering and before leaf fall, based on the assessed risk of the specific orchard and local weather, and on removal of affected shoots at summer and winter pruning to reduce inoculum sources [20]. Registered active substances are few, which is why pruning is not a supplementary measure but a basic one.

    Constriction canker will be covered in a separate, detailed article. It is included here only to the extent needed to separate it from the other causes of shoot dieback and gummosis.

    The point of immediate interest to the grower is that autumn, not spring, is the period of risk — as it is for bacterial canker. The two diseases share the same entry point and the same window, and an orchard with no autumn treatment leaves both of them free.

    Silver leaf

    The fungus grows over a wide temperature range with an optimum of 25 °C, and wood-exposing wounds are most susceptible in the first week after injury [2]. The impossibility of protecting every wound and of eradicating established infections from the trunk make prevention the only real option: clean nursery stock, minimising large wood-exposing cuts, and pruning technique that promotes rapid wound healing [2].

    Wood-decay fungi

    The woody perennial fruiting bodies that appear on old wounds are not the cause of the dieback but its indicator: these are fungi that are not strongly pathogenic, but cause serious decay in trees already suffering from other causes.

    Fruiting body of a wood-decay fungus with a porous hymenium on peach
    The lower surface of the fruiting body, with its characteristic porous hymenium. The visible body of the fungus is the tip of a problem that has been inside the wood for years — and it almost always started at a wound.

    What their appearance means and what should be checked next is analysed in the article on wood-decay fungi on peach.

    Sources: 1 2 20

    6. Diseases of the root and crown

    Armillaria — the disease that is decided before planting

    Two species matter. Armillaria mellea produces rhizomorphs, black cords like string that actively explore the soil and reach new roots. Desarmillaria tabescens produces no rhizomorphs and spreads only by root-to-root contact — but it is a primary pathogen and does not need a stressed tree in order to kill [1]. In Europe A. mellea and A. ostoyae predominate [2].

    The three diagnostic signs are absolute and resemble nothing else:

    • White to yellowish mycelial fans between the bark and the wood, at the crown and on the large roots [2] [9].
    • Dark brown to black rhizomorphs on the root surfaces [9].
    • Honey-coloured mushrooms at the base of the trunk after heavy rain [1] [2].

    Two practical observations separate root rot from peach tree short life: the affected tree dies slowly, with sparse new growth, very short shoots and light green, yellow or reddish leaves, while most of the above-ground wood remains alive and it is the roots and the below-ground trunk that are dead; and to find the dead roots in spring it may be necessary to dig 15 to 45 cm below the surface [16]. The disease is also more severe in low wet areas and on newly cleared land [16].

    The fungus survives in the soil for many years as mycelium within infected tissue and as rhizomorphs [2] [9], and is most successful at invading healthy tissue once it has first become established saprophytically — which is why very young trees in soil full of roots from a previous crop are the most exposed [2].

    Peach orchard with one declining tree beside healthy ones
    Field distribution as a diagnostic element: the left-hand tree has sparse, short growth and bare scaffolds, while its neighbours are normal. Scattered individual trees in this condition point to root rot, Verticillium wilt or a wood borer, not to Phytophthora.
    The history of the block is part of the diagnosis The basic recommendation is not to plant peach on land recently cleared of forest or with a documented history of Armillaria [9]. Where that has not been observed, no intervention fully corrects it. The question "what do I spray" has no answer here.

    Two measures with documented results. First, a trench about 1.2 m deep, lined with plastic, around the infection centre, which prevents spread to healthy roots [9]. Second, root collar excavation: removing the soil around the crown and upper root zone to a depth of 23 to 30 cm in spring, keeping the area dry through the growing season and periodically clearing debris from it [9]. The mechanism is continuous mild heating and drying, which prevents the fungus from colonising the exposed crown [8].

    A development of the same idea is planting the trees approximately 40 cm higher than normal, in open-bottom fabric pots, and excavating the collar eight months later. In five-year trials in two orchards in South Carolina, control trees showed 30 to 70% decline, while trees under this treatment showed only 0 to 10% [8].

    A warning about rootstocks There is no rootstock that solves everything, and some choices trade one problem for another. Guardian, which came to dominate the American south because it is highly tolerant of peach tree short life and very resistant to ring nematode, is highly susceptible to Armillaria [2]. Rootstock choice is made on the basis of the specific block, not of general reputation.

    Phytophthora crown and root rot

    The species involved are Phytophthora cactorum, P. cambivora, P. megasperma and P. cryptogea [1]. Zoospores are attracted by root exudates, encyst on the root surface and infect the fine feeder roots. Crowns subjected to prolonged wetness from flood irrigation or heavy rain develop crown rot, and after each rain or irrigation a new generation of sporangia restarts the cycle [2].

    Peach tree with crown infection and gum exudation
    Peach. Crown infection with gum exudation. Diagnosis is made only after the outer bark is removed: underneath, the discoloration shows a sharp margin against the healthy tissue.
    Discoloration of peach bark after removal of the outer layer
    The discoloration of the bark after removal of the outer layer. In advanced attacks it extends upwards, as much as 60 cm from the ground.

    The feature that separates Phytophthora from every other cause of dieback is the distribution in the field: it appears in patches, where water stands, in low spots, or along the drip line. Armillaria and Verticillium wilt strike scattered individual trees. This single observation, which costs nothing and is made from the edge of the block, separates three diseases without a laboratory.

    The full analysis, with the stages of the attack and the point at which it is too late, is in the article on Phytophthora and crown rots in fruit trees, available in Greek only.

    Verticillium wilt

    Verticillium dahliae produces microsclerotia that survive in the soil for many years without a host, when soil temperature is 5 to 15 °C and moisture-holding capacity is 50 to 75% [2]. Their highest concentration is at a depth of 15 to 30 cm, but they are found as deep as 105 cm [2].

    The first symptom is sudden wilting of the leaves on one or more scaffolds during hot weather in summer; the leaves turn yellow, then brown, and curl [2]. On young trees the whole tree may defoliate, while on older ones only individual scaffolds are affected. A longitudinal cut shows brown to black streaks in the sapwood; a cross-section shows a discoloured ring in the outer xylem [2].

    The history of the block is again critical: the disease often appears where peach has been planted after years of cotton, tomato or pepper [2]. No resistant rootstocks are known [2].

    Sources: 1 2 8 9 16

    7. Viruses and the fruit deformation disease

    Twenty identified viruses and one viroid have been reported on peach, apricot and plum [4]. The first thing to be said is negative: diagnosis of stone fruit virus diseases cannot be based on symptomatology, because symptoms are affected by species and cultivar, by the strain of the pathogen, by host age, by environmental conditions and by the presence of mixed infections with a second and third virus. Diagnosis rests on laboratory methods [4].

    Sharka — plum pox

    Plum pox virus is the most destructive virus disease of stone fruit. In Greece it is very widely distributed, mainly in the Peloponnese on apricot and in Macedonia on peach, and has severely damaged both the crop and the juicing and canning industry [4].

    Why the Greek case is the difficult one Four strain groups of the virus have been described. Group PPV-M is of Greek origin — it was isolated from peach in northern Greece — and is the prevailing group in the country. It produces severe, sometimes necrotic symptoms, is readily transmitted by aphids and constitutes the epidemic form of the virus. Group PPV-D, which predominates in western Europe, is transmitted with difficulty by aphids and constitutes the non-epidemic form [4]. In other words, the measures that suffice in France do not suffice here.

    On peach, the leaves show chlorosis of the veins or diffuse chlorotic bands around them; a characteristic symptom is the shortening of the veins in their chlorotic portion, which distorts the blade [4]. On apricot, yellow rings with a dark centre on the stone are a pathognomonic symptom, since they appear even when leaves and fruit look healthy [4].

    The main route of long-distance spread is infected propagating material; aphid vectors are responsible for gradual spread within the nursery or orchard and between neighbouring orchards [4]. An important reservoir is blackthorn (Prunus spinosa), a common shrub in Greece which shows no symptoms and acts as a latent host [4].

    Tolerant cultivars have been evaluated in practice against the strongly pathogenic Greek strains. Among them, for the fresh market, Spring Time, Dixired, Cardinal, Red Heaven, Sun Crest, Blake, Red Cap, Honey Dew Hale and Shipper's Late Red, and for canning the clingstone cultivars Cortez, Loadel, Andros and Fortuna [4].

    Plum pox is a regulated harmful organism. Diagnosis, notification and management of outbreaks are the responsibility of the competent plant health service.

    Necrotic ringspot and prune dwarf

    Prunus necrotic ringspot virus and Prune dwarf virus infect peach, plum, sweet and sour cherry and almond [4]. On peach, PDV causes two diseases: "peach stunt" in single infection and "peach rosette and decline" in mixed infection with PNRSV [4]. One practical element changes the management: diseased trees are more sensitive to low temperatures [4] — a virus can therefore present as frost damage.

    In the orchard the disease spreads by pollen, and peach latent mosaic viroid (PLMVd) spreads by pruning shears [4]. The latter is one of the few points at which disinfecting tools between trees has demonstrated value.

    The fruit deformation disease

    A separate case, because it resembles a virus disease without having been identified as one in samples from the area. The fruit carries deep folds and furrows, dark sunken areas and sections that never colour, while the surrounding foliage remains apparently healthy.

    Two peaches with deep folds and sunken dark areas
    Two fruit with deep folds and dark sunken areas. The foliage shows nothing at all — which is why the problem is not noticed before the fruit has grown.
    Three deformed peaches on the scaffold branch
    The same fruit on the tree. The furrows follow the suture and the green sections never coloured, while the surrounding foliage shows no symptom.

    The history of the case, the virological analyses that were carried out, what they excluded and the current picture from the international literature are analysed in the article on peach fruit deformation disease. The cause is included in the tool because in practice it is confused with plum pox and with mechanical damage, and the distinction has consequences: one is a regulated organism, the other is not.

    Sources: 4

    8. The Lepidoptera: twig borer, oriental fruit moth, tortrix

    These three insects are the centre of gravity of peach crop protection in Central Macedonia, and for once local data exist instead of imported models. A study in eight peach orchards in the prefecture of Pella recorded, with pheromone traps from April to October in 2018 and 2020, the seasonal occurrence of Anarsia lineatella, Grapholita molesta and Adoxophyes orana, and used 2021 data to validate the predictions [3].

    The degree-days of Pella

    The lower developmental thresholds used are 11.4 °C for the peach twig borer, 9.5 °C for the oriental fruit moth and 7.2 °C for the summer fruit tortrix, and in every case the starting point of accumulation — the biofix — is 1 January [3].

    Why a calendar biofix matters Most foreign models set the biofix at the first capture in the trap. The Pella model sets 1 January as the starting point, which means no moth needs to have been caught before the calculation begins. That allows the first capture to be predicted rather than merely recorded, but it also means the figures are not comparable with those in American guidelines, which are measured from first capture.
    InsectLower thresholdFirst capturePeak of first flightPeak of second flight
    Peach twig borer (Anarsia lineatella) 11.4 °C 70 degree-days 150.6 degree-days 511.5 degree-days
    Oriental fruit moth (Grapholita molesta) 9.5 °C 33 degree-days 77.9 degree-days 204.8 degree-days
    Summer fruit tortrix (Adoxophyes orana) 7.2 °C 362 degree-days 428.7 degree-days 1,239.5 degree-days

    All values from the published Pella study [3], with degree-days accumulated from 1 January and with the lower thresholds in the second column. The values are specific to each species and are not interchangeable.

    For the start of the second flight, the values are 365 degree-days for the peach twig borer, 133 for the oriental fruit moth and 1,028 for the summer fruit tortrix [3].

    A correction that required checking the full text The published abstract of the study gives, for the start of the second flight of the summer fruit tortrix, the value 362 — that is, exactly the same as the first capture of the same species. That cannot be right: the start of the second flight cannot coincide with the first capture of the first. In the full text of the paper the value is 1,028 degree-days, which sits correctly between the peak of the first flight (428.7) and the peak of the second (1,239.5) [3]. It is a typographical error in the abstract. Anyone working from the abstract alone will derive the wrong timing for the second generation of the tortrix.

    Peach twig borer

    Anarsia lineatella overwinters as a first- or second-instar larva inside a tiny cell, the hibernaculum, in crotches, pruning wounds and bark cracks [6]. Larvae emerge in early spring, during bloom, and move up to the new growth.

    Damage is of two kinds. On the growth, larvae mine inside the elongating shoots and cause terminal dieback — the so-called shoot strikes. On the fruit, they generally enter at the stem end or along the suture and feed just under the skin [6].

    Peach shoot strike with a dried terminal
    A shoot strike: the terminal has dried while the rest of the shoot remains vigorous. The picture is common to both the twig borer and the oriental fruit moth — counting strikes per tree gives the threshold, not the identification.

    The treatment threshold based on growth is three shoot strikes per tree [6]. As to timing, American guidelines place treatment at 300 to 400 degree-days from first capture, with thresholds of 10 and 31 °C — 400 for green fruit, 300 for colouring fruit [6]. These values are not the same as the Pella degree-days, because both the starting point and the lower threshold differ.

    Oriental fruit moth

    Grapholita molesta overwinters as a mature diapausing larva inside a tightly woven cocoon, in protected places on the tree or in debris near its base [5]. In California it completes five generations per year, and a sixth has been observed in years with warm early spring and late autumn [5].

    The early generations produce shoot strikes, as the twig borer does. Later ones turn to the shoot terminals and the green fruit: the mature larva generally enters at the stem end and bores to the centre, feeding around the pit [5].

    The one cut that separates the two insects Peach twig borer: a superficial gallery, just under the skin, entering at the stem end or the suture.
    Oriental fruit moth: a gallery reaching the pit, with feeding around the stone.
    The distinction is not academic: the two flights do not coincide, and in Pella degree-days the oriental fruit moth peaks far earlier than the twig borer [3].

    The treatment threshold is likewise an average of three shoot strikes per tree in heavy infestations [5]. Fruit sampling is weekly, with emphasis on the final four weeks before harvest [5].

    Two points with practical value. First, mating disruption is the preferred strategy where it is applied over sufficient area [5]. Second, the parasitoid Macrocentrus ancylivorus can reach 80 to 90% parasitism by August and September in orchards that avoid broad-spectrum insecticides [5]. A figure of that size is not decorative: it is control of the second and third generation at no cost, and it is lost with a single unsuitable spray.

    Summer fruit tortrix

    Adoxophyes orana webs leaves and shoot terminals with silken threads and feeds inside that protected environment. Damage to the fruit is superficial: scarring of the skin, characteristically where a leaf touches the fruit.

    In the Pella data the tortrix differs from the other two on two counts: it has the lowest developmental threshold (7.2 °C) but the largest degree-day requirement — 362 against 70 and 33 for first capture, and 1,239.5 against 511.5 and 204.8 for the peak of the second flight [3]. In practice this means the tortrix appears later in the season despite its lower threshold, and that its second generation falls at a stage when the fruit is already susceptible.

    The trap is not the threshold Pheromone traps give timing, not population size, and not a decision on their own. The treatment decision comes from combining the capture curve with field counts of shoot strikes and fruit damage. Degree-days say when the count should be made, not whether the treatment will be made.

    Sources: 3 5 6

    9. Sap-sucking pests

    Spider mites

    On peach the species of interest are mainly Tetranychus urticae and Panonychus ulmi. They overwinter as adult females in protected places on the tree or in litter and weeds, with a characteristic reddish-orange colour in diapause [7].

    The figures explain why mites escape so fast: in summer heat a generation is completed in ten days, and depending on temperature 8 to 18 generations per year are completed [7].

    Damage is stippling and bronzing of the leaves, and in heavy infestations severe leaf drop. The cost is not only the foliage: premature defoliation prevents the fruit from sizing and exposes fruit and scaffolds to sunburn [7].

    Peach leaf with dense fine stippling from spider mite feeding
    Dense fine stippling across the whole blade — the leaf loses colour without forming discrete lesions. That absence of a defined lesion is what separates mite feeding from every fungal leaf spot.
    The two measures that work before any acaricide Heat, drought and dust favour population explosions. Management begins with adequate irrigation — water stress encourages infestation — and with watering or surfacing dirt roads to keep dust to a minimum [7]. The predatory mite Galendromus occidentalis completes a generation in seven days, that is faster than its prey, and can control the population where it is not destroyed by unsuitable sprays [7].

    Green peach aphid

    Myzus persicae has peach as its primary host: it overwinters as wingless females or as eggs beneath the bud scales. After hatching, several generations of wingless adults follow, and in June the winged forms appear; all aphids leave the peach trees during June and July [17].

    The treatment thresholds differ greatly between the two fruit types: one colony per tree on nectarines, five or more colonies per tree on peaches, with larger trees tolerating more. Inspection is weekly from petal fall until the terminals harden off [17].

    Beyond the direct damage — curling of the terminals, honeydew, sooty mould — the green peach aphid is a vector of plum pox virus [17]. In a region where the epidemic PPV-M strain predominates, which is readily aphid-transmitted [4], the aphid threshold concerns more than this year's damage.

    Comstock mealybug

    Pseudococcus comstocki is an invasive species of Asian origin, established in northern Italy and southern France since the early 2000s [12]. A survey in north-eastern Italy recorded twenty-one host species, among them peach, apple, pear, mulberry and a range of ornamentals [11].

    The biology that governs management: three generations per year and overwintering in the egg stage [11]. First-generation hatching occurs during April, the nymphs settle on the lower leaf surface, adult females appear in June and early July, and egg-laying runs from mid-June to mid-July. The second generation hatches in early to mid-July and the third from late August to early October [11].

    Where it hides — and why sprays fail As they mature, the females move towards the scaffolds and trunk in search of sheltered places to lay eggs. In the later generations this behaviour intensifies, and the females work their way into the stem cavity of peaches and the calyx cavity of apples [11]. An insect inside the stem cavity, covered by waxy secretion, is not wetted by the sprayer. The difference between success and failure is the timing at hatch, while the crawlers are still exposed on the leaves.
    Mealybugs inside the stem cavity of a peach
    Mealybugs inside the stem cavity of a peach, with honeydew and debris around them. That exact position is what the literature describes for the later generations [11], and it is exactly where the sprayer does not reach.
    Nectarine with a greyish mass of wax and honeydew in the stem cavity
    A nectarine with the characteristic greyish mass of waxy secretion, honeydew and debris inside the stem cavity. At this stage the fruit is already unmarketable, and the insect itself is not even visible unless the cavity is opened.
    Adult female mealybugs with white waxy secretion, close-up
    Adult females at close range. The white waxy secretion and the lateral filaments are the feature that separates the mealybug from scale, which forms a hard armour fixed to the bark.

    The economic damage arises less from feeding than from the honeydew and sooty mould that downgrade marketability. In infested orchards in southern France, with high infestation rates and severe sooty mould, rejection of up to 80% of the harvested fruit is reported [12]. That figure concerns pome fruit and is given in the publication explicitly as a personal communication, not as a measured experiment — it is cited here as an order of magnitude of the risk, not as an expected value for peach.

    For biological control, the two parasitoids selected in a European programme are Allotropa burrelli and Acerophagus malinus; by contrast, Clausenia purpurea was rejected as non-specific, since it also parasitises other mealybug species [12].

    The species has already been recorded on persimmon fruit in Macedonia, as described in the related article, available in Greek only.

    San Jose scale

    San Jose scale has a complex life cycle with overlapping stages, and can produce up to four generations of crawlers per season [13]. The overwintering nymphs are found on twigs, scaffolds and trunks, and in spring develop into winged males and stationary females [13].

    The most useful field test is simple: rubbing the scale covers with the hand. If the insect is dead, the cover flakes off clean; if it is alive, rubbing leaves a yellow to reddish deposit on the hand [13]. That distinction decides whether treatment is needed or whether the infestation is old and already dead.

    On the fruit, the crawlers settle and produce the characteristic red spots around each cover. In the wood, heavy infestations weaken and finally kill twigs and scaffolds [13]. Because scale development is closely tied to temperature, monitoring the stages determines the timing of treatment; the classic basis remains the dormant oil application.

    Thrips

    Thrips damage on stone fruit appears at two points in time. At flowering and fruit set, larval activity causes scarring and russeting of the skin, which expands and turns brown as the fruit grows. At the final fruit swell stage, damage appears as patches of silvering on the skin, particularly where it has been protected by leaves or by fruit touching [13].

    The monitoring recommendation is sampling of buds and flowers plus sticky traps, fortnightly, with particular attention at the pink and full bloom stages [13]. Ground cover management has a direct effect: broadleaf weeds and flowering plants sustain the populations, and replacing them with grasses reduces movement into the trees, since some thrips species do not feed on grasses [13]. Mowing is done after shuck fall is complete and not during flowering, because otherwise the thrips move up into the trees [13].

    Sources: 4 7 11 12 13 17

    10. Wood borers and fruit feeders

    The flat-headed root borer

    Capnodis tenebrionis is the pest that kills trees without producing a symptom at eye level. Adults emerge in spring and feed on young shoots, twigs, buds and leaf petioles; they live for more than a year and may overwinter twice [10].

    Females lay eggs in summer in dry soil near the trunk and prefer weakened trees. Egg-laying begins at 23 °C and peaks in the optimum range of 30 to 34 °C, typically in July and August; one female can produce more than 1,000 eggs per year under favourable conditions [10].

    Neonate larvae penetrate the roots and feed on the cortical tissue. Development lasts 6 to 18 months depending on temperature and rootstock. The most serious damage comes from galleries in the roots and the lower part of the trunk, and a few larvae are enough to kill a large tree within two years [10].

    The mechanism that makes drip irrigation a risk factor Water stress and tree age determine susceptibility. The insect strongly prefers weakened trees, and adequate irrigation keeps the tree in a state that resists. Poor water management — and specifically drip irrigation that leaves dry patches of soil around the trunk — increases the risk of outbreak [10], because it creates exactly the dry substrate the female selects for egg-laying, next to a tree that is simultaneously under stress.
    Adult Capnodis tenebrionis on a peach shoot
    An adult on a peach shoot, beside the fruit. The gnawing at the base of the tender laterals is visible; those laterals dry while the leaves below them stay green. The adult is the visible part — the damage is done below ground.

    As to control, entomopathogenic nematodes and fungi have given 75 to 97% control in field trials [10]. Resistant rootstock options are limited. Cultural measures — hand collection of adults, irrigation management, physical barriers at the trunk base — remain the backbone of the strategy [10].

    In detail, with the field diagnostic signs, in the article on Capnodis tenebrionis.

    Goat moth

    Cossus cossus belongs to the wood-boring Lepidoptera of the family Cossidae, and is the best known of the twenty-six species of that family reported as pests of commercial woody plants [21]. Its host range is enormous and includes almost every fruit tree of the region: peach and other Prunus, apple, pear, quince, cherry, apricot, walnut, chestnut, persimmon, mulberry, olive and grapevine, along with willow, poplar, oak, elm and maple [21].

    The biology explains why an infestation goes unnoticed for years. The adults are nocturnal and poor fliers, with limited dispersal ability [21]. Females lay eggs in bark cracks, usually in the lower parts of the trunk, in groups of 12 to 70 [22]. The cycle lasts two to four years depending on region and food quality, and most of it is spent in the larval stage [21] [22]; the larva overwinters the first year in the phloem and then feeds actively inside the wood [22].

    Mature goat moth larvae, large and pinkish red, beside frass and bark
    Mature goat moth larvae from the base of a peach trunk. The size, the pink to reddish colour, the dark head and the powerful mandibles resemble nothing else in the crop. Beside them, the wood chips and frass that fill the gallery.

    The mature larva reaches 7 to 10 cm, is pink to pinkish-brown with strong mandibles, and cuts a gallery about 15 mm wide and up to one metre long, with dark walls [22]. When the galleries multiply, the trunk takes on the characteristic honey-combed appearance — and this happens because the females prefer to lay eggs in areas that are already infested [21].

    The feature that needs no tool: the smell The infestation produces a strong, very characteristic vinegar smell at the base of the trunk, from the fermenting liquids running out of the galleries [22]. Together with the coarse wood chips mixed with frass, expelled through the lower openings [22], it is the pair that closes the diagnosis on the spot.
    How it is separated from the flat-headed root borer Goat moth: a wide gallery inside the wood, coarse wood chips at the exit, a vinegar smell, and large pinkish-red caterpillars.
    Flat-headed root borer: galleries in the roots and in the cortical tissue of the lower trunk, fine sawdust, no smell, and a beetle larva — legless, white, with an enlarged front section.
    The distinction changes the management: the flat-headed borer works below the soil and is linked to dryness around the base, the goat moth inside the wood and is linked to old wounds.

    The damage is not only the loss of tissue. The galleries make large scaffolds and trunks prone to wind breakage and lead to tree decline and mortality, while reducing growth, yield and fruit quality [21]. As to control, the review of the family stresses the importance of pheromone traps and the need for an integrated approach; no single intervention is sufficient [21].

    In detail, with the field symptoms, in the article on the goat moth.

    Mediterranean fruit fly

    Ceratitis capitata attacks ripe and ripening fruit. The diagnostic sign is the oviposition puncture with a dark halo around it and the presence of larvae inside the flesh. Because the attack coincides with harvest, the options are limited and the strategy rests on trap monitoring, clearing fallen fruit and managing neighbouring late hosts. In detail in the article on the Mediterranean fruit fly, available in Greek only.

    Sources: 10 21 22

    11. Physiological disorders mistaken for diseases

    Split pit

    A serious physiological disorder of stone fruit and of peach in particular. Splitting at the early stages occurs typically about twenty days after full bloom, while the pit is still soft, but it can also occur after the pit hardens — and then the damage is greater [14]. The pit splits along the suture under pressure from the flesh, which continues to expand while still attached to the pit; in extreme cases the pit shatters [14].

    The practices that cause it are exactly the practices for large fruit Beyond the environmental causes — low temperatures and frost at bloom and early fruit development, a late frost, heavy rain at a critical stage — split pit is also caused by management choices aimed at larger fruit: increased watering, excessive thinning and fertilisation close to harvest, which lead to rapid swelling of the flesh [14]. It is the price of an excess, not a pathogen.

    There is also a genetic component, with clear practical value: early-maturing cultivars — for example June Gold and Spring Gold — are more affected, because final swell and pit hardening coincide in time. In late cultivars the two phases are separated, and the bond between flesh and pit has time to loosen before the flesh swells [14]. The practical consequence: thinning an early cultivar is not done on the same criteria as thinning a late one.

    One useful identification feature: split-pit fruit are heavier than normal ones, owing to a heavier mesocarp and exocarp [14].

    Chilling injury in storage

    Chilling injury appears in stone fruit exposed to temperatures below 15 °C, with the critical value depending on maturity at harvest and cultivar susceptibility [14]. The typical symptoms are pitting of the skin, from collapse of the cells beneath it, and browning of the flesh around the vascular bundles [14].

    "Mealy" or "woolly" flesh is likewise an expression of chilling injury, and appears in peaches and nectarines held at low temperature for long periods: altered cell wall enzyme activity gives a dry, woolly texture [14]. Cultivars with non-melting, firm flesh are less susceptible than melting-flesh ones [14].

    Chilling injury is not infectious and is not addressed by plant protection. It is included in the tool because at crate level it is confused with decay, and because the distinction completely changes what needs correcting.

    Sunburn

    Not only fruit damage. Scaffolds left bare after premature defoliation — from rust, from spider mites, from bacterial spot — are exposed to direct radiation, become sunscalded, and the killed areas are then colonised by wood-rotting fungi; those scaffolds weaken, become less productive and break under the weight of a crop [13]. Painting trunks with acrylic paint is a documented measure against sun injury and indirectly against perennial canker [2].

    Sources: 2 13 14

    12. The look-alike table

    Each row is a pair that is confused in practice, and the third column is the one feature that resolves it without a laboratory.

    Looks likeBut may beThe feature that separates them
    Peach twig borer in the fruit Oriental fruit moth A cut. The twig borer feeds just under the skin; the oriental fruit moth reaches the pit [5] [6].
    Shoot terminal dieback from a moth Adult Capnodis feeding A gallery inside the shoot. With the moth it is there; with the flat-headed borer the dieback follows external gnawing at the base of the tender shoot [10].
    Canker with gum on a scaffold Fungal gummosis from Botryosphaeria The sour odour of the bark in spring: present in bacterial canker, absent in fungal gummosis [1].
    A dried shoot that breaks at the same point Constriction canker from Diaporthe amygdali The position. The Diaporthe canker is nodal — it forms exactly on the node, at a leaf or bud scar, and constricts the shoot; dieback from a moth leaves a gallery inside the shoot [20].
    Galleries and sawdust at the trunk base Goat moth instead of flat-headed root borer The smell and the larva. The goat moth gives a strong vinegar smell, coarse wood chips and large pinkish-red caterpillars; the flat-headed borer works in the roots, without smell, with a legless beetle larva [10] [22].
    Dieback in patches at the low spots Dieback on scattered individual trees The distribution in the field. Patches where water stands point to Phytophthora; scattered trees point to Armillaria, Verticillium wilt or Capnodis [2].
    Wilting of a whole scaffold in summer Verticillium wilt or Armillaria A cut in the branch and digging at the crown. A ring in the wood indicates Verticillium; white fans under the bark indicate Armillaria [2].
    Killed blossoms on the spur Frost damage Blossoms with brown rot stay firmly attached, with a gum drop at the peduncle; frost drops them [2].
    Black spots on the fruit Bacterial spot The depth. Bacterial spot lesions are deep cracks, whereas scab lesions are strictly superficial [16]; bacterial spot is also more severe on the windward side [2].
    Decay on ripe fruit Anthracnose instead of brown rot A cut. Anthracnose gives a hard cone-shaped lesion that separates from the healthy mesocarp; brown rot does not [2].
    Holes in the leaves Bacterial spot instead of shot hole The shape of the lesion before it drops out: round in shot hole, angular and delimited by the veins in bacterial spot [2].
    White powder on the leaves Apple powdery mildew from a neighbouring block The neighbourhood. The "rusty spot" lesion on peach may come from Podosphaera leucotricha on nearby apple trees [1].
    Deformed fruit Plum pox or the fruit deformation disease The stone and the leaves. Rings on the stone and chlorotic bands along the veins indicate plum pox; apparently healthy foliage with deep furrows on the fruit indicates the deformation disease [4].
    Split fruit Split pit instead of rain cracking The stone. In split pit the stone is broken along the suture and the fruit is heavier than normal [14].
    Sooty mould on the foliage Mealybug, aphid or scale Where the insect is. White wax in bark cracks and in the stem cavity indicates mealybug; colonies on the terminals indicate aphid; armoured covers on the bark indicate scale [11] [13] [17].
    Flesh breakdown after cold storage Chilling injury instead of fungal decay Absence of mycelium and spores; skin pitting and browning around the vascular bundles indicate chilling injury [14].

    13. The annual monitoring calendar

    The table is not a spray programme. It shows when the observation is made that decides whether treatment is needed, and which phenological stage corresponds to the critical window for each cause.

    Phenological stageWhat is monitoredWhy then
    Leaf fall, autumn Leaf scars, pruning cuts Shared entry point for bacterial canker and for Diaporthe amygdali; infection at 12–18 °C and 5–15 °C respectively, with Diaporthe inoculum at its annual maximum [1] [2] [20]
    Dormancy Mummies in the canopy, twig cankers, scab lesions in the wood, scale covers, twig borer hibernacula All the inoculum and the overwintering population are on the tree and within reach of the pruning shears [1] [2] [6] [13]
    Before bud swell The last window for peach leaf curl After bud break no treatment has any effect [2]
    Pink to full bloom Thrips in buds and flowers; wetness duration and temperature for brown rot Blossom infection in 6–12 hours at 15–20 °C; thrips damage starts here [2] [13]
    Petal fall Scab conidia production from the wood lesions; start of aphid counts The inoculum that matters for the fruit is produced now, but the symptom will appear in 40–70 days [2] [17]
    About 20 days after full bloom Intensity of thinning and irrigation in early cultivars The split pit window, while the pit is still soft [14]
    Shoot growth, spring Shoot strikes — counted per tree; pheromone traps Threshold of three strikes per tree for twig borer and oriental fruit moth [5] [6]
    Mealybug hatch, April Lower leaf surfaces for crawlers The only exposed stage; later they hide in the bark and the stem cavity [11]
    Pit hardening to ripening Spider mites with five-minute searches; dust and irrigation adequacy A generation in ten days in the heat; defoliation prevents the fruit from sizing [7]
    Four weeks before harvest Weekly fruit sampling with a cut The period of greatest fruit damage from Lepidoptera [5]
    Mid to late summer Rust on the leaves; temperature and wetness duration 18 hours of wetness at 20 °C are enough for infection; defoliation costs next year's crop [2] [13]
    After harvest Dieback of individual trees, digging at the crown, fruiting bodies at the base Root and crown diseases become visible once the fruit's water demand stops [2] [8]

    The annual cultural operations that frame the above — pruning, thinning, irrigation, fertilisation — are described in the article on annual cultural operations in peach, available in Greek only, while water management during pit hardening is analysed in the article on regulated deficit irrigation in peach and nectarine. Postharvest nutrition, which determines the following year, is covered in postharvest nutrition in stone fruit.

    Sources: 1 2 5 6 7 8 11 13 14 17

    14. Sources

    The numbers in the text refer to the list below. For each source it is stated explicitly whether the full text or only the abstract was used.

    • [1] Luo C.-X., Schnabel G., Hu M., De Cal A. (2022). Global distribution and management of peach diseases. Phytopathology Research 4:30. Full text, open access, peer-reviewed. Source for the ranking of the most important diseases by country, the Monilinia species, the overwintering of peach leaf curl on the twig surface, the distinction between Armillaria mellea and Desarmillaria tabescens, the sour odour in bacterial canker and the role of ring nematode, the 50% of shoots figure for Diaporthe, and the "rusty spot" from Podosphaera leucotricha.
    • [2] Adaskaveg J.E., Schnabel G., Ritchie D.F., Förster H. — Common Preharvest Diseases of Peach and Nectarine Caused by Fungi and Bacteria: Biology, Epidemiology and Management. Chapter 12, CABI. Full chapter text. The main quantitative source of this article: wetness hours and infection temperatures for brown rot, shot hole, scab, rust, powdery mildew and leaf curl; the 40–70 day scab symptom delay; the biology of Verticillium wilt and Armillaria; peach tree short life and its ten-point management programme; bacterial spot and the role of wind; crown gall.
    • [3] Damos P.T., Soulopoulou P., Gkouderis D., Monastiridis D., Vrettou M., Sakellariou D., Thomidis T. (2022). Degree-day risk thresholds for predicting the occurrence of Anarsia lineatella, Grapholita molesta and Adoxophyes orana in northern Greece peach orchards. Plant Protection Science 58(3):234–244. Open access, peer-reviewed; the full published abstract and the reference list were used. The only local source: eight peach orchards in the prefecture of Pella, years 2018 and 2020 with validation in 2021. Source for every degree-day value in the table, the lower thresholds of 11.4, 9.5 and 7.2 °C and the 1 January biofix.
    • [4] Bem F. (2007). The most serious virus diseases of apricot, peach and plum. Georgia – Ktinotrofia, issue 6/2007 (in Greek). Full text. The author is a virologist and former Director of the Department of Phytopathology of the Benaki Phytopathological Institute. Source for the Greek picture of plum pox: the predominance of the PPV-M strain of Greek origin, its distribution on peach in Macedonia, blackthorn as a latent host, the list of tolerant cultivars, and the transmission of PLMVd by pruning shears.
    • [5] UC IPM — Oriental Fruit Moth, Peach. UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. Full guideline text. Source for the five generations of the oriental fruit moth, overwintering as a diapausing mature larva in a cocoon, boring to the pit, the three-shoot-strike threshold, the final four weeks of fruit sampling, and the 80–90% parasitism by Macrocentrus ancylivorus.
    • [6] UC IPM — Peach Twig Borer, Peach. UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. Full guideline text. Source for the overwintering of the peach twig borer as a first- or second-instar larva in a hibernaculum, feeding just under the skin, the three-shoot-strike threshold, and the 300–400 degree-days from first capture with thresholds of 10 and 31 °C.
    • [7] UC IPM — Webspinning Spider Mites, Peach. UC Statewide Integrated Pest Management Program. Full guideline text. Source for the ten-day generation, the 8–18 generations per year, the overwintering of the females, the role of dust and water stress, and the seven-day generation of the predator Galendromus occidentalis.
    • [8] Clemson University Cooperative Extension — Armillaria Root Rot (peach). Full page text. Source for the above-ground root collar excavation technique — planting approximately 40 cm higher in open-bottom pots and excavating the collar eight months later — and for the five-year results in two orchards: 30–70% decline in the controls against 0–10% in the treatment.
    • [9] UC IPM — Armillaria Root Rot (Oak Root Fungus), Peach. Full guideline text. Source for the white to yellowish mycelial fans, the dark rhizomorphs, survival in the soil, the plastic-lined trench around the infection centre, and root collar excavation to a depth of 23–30 cm in spring.
    • [10] Nasouri H. (2024). Capnodis tenebrionis (Coleoptera: Buprestidae). Journal of Integrated Pest Management 15(1):20. Peer-reviewed review; the main body of the text was used. Source for egg-laying in dry soil near the trunk beginning at 23 °C with an optimum of 30–34 °C, the more than 1,000 eggs per female, larval development in 6–18 months, the death of a large tree from a few larvae within two years, the role of drip irrigation, and the 75–97% control with entomopathogens.
    • [11] Pellizzari G., Duso C., Rainato A., Pozzebon A., Zanini G. (2012). Phenology, ethology and distribution of Pseudococcus comstocki, an invasive pest in northeastern Italy. Bulletin of Insectology 65:209–215. Full text. Source for the three generations per year, overwintering in the egg stage, the hatching and egg-laying dates of each generation, the twenty-one host species including peach, and the movement of the females towards the scaffolds and into the stem cavity of peaches.
    • [12] Malausa T. et al. (2016). Investigating Biological Control Agents for Controlling Invasive Populations of the Mealybug Pseudococcus comstocki in France. PLoS ONE 11(6):e0157965. Full text, open access, peer-reviewed. Source for the establishment of the species in southern France and northern Italy, for the selection of the parasitoids Allotropa burrelli and Acerophagus malinus and the rejection of Clausenia purpurea as non-specific, and for the report of up to 80% of fruit discarded in infested orchards — which the publication gives explicitly as a personal communication and which concerns pome fruit.
    • [13] NSW Department of Primary Industries — Integrated Pest and Disease Management for Australian Summerfruit, fact sheets on rust, San Jose scale and thrips. Full fact sheet texts. Source for the consequences of premature defoliation from rust — autumn flowering, sunscald of the bare scaffolds, colonisation by wood-rotting fungi —, for the up to four generations of scale crawlers and the rubbing test on the covers, and for the two timings of thrips damage and the management of the ground cover.
    • [14] Malik A.R., Raja R.H.S., Javaid R. — Physiological Disorders in Stone Fruits, chapter 7. Full chapter text. Source for split pit about twenty days after full bloom, the role of excessive thinning and irrigation, the greater susceptibility of early cultivars, the greater weight of split-pit fruit, and for chilling injury below 15 °C with pitting and browning around the vascular bundles.
    • [15] Hartman J.R. — Peach Fruit Diseases. University of Kentucky, Plant Pathology Fact Sheet PPFS-FR-T-09. Full text. Source for the appearance of scab six to seven weeks after petal fall and for the fact that the skin of infected fruit does not slip off easily in hot water before processing.
    • [16] Clemson University Cooperative Extension Service, CE 16 (reprinted 1997) — Peach Diseases: An Aid to Identification and Control. Full text. Illustrated identification guide. Source for three field criteria: that bacterial spot fruit lesions are deep cracks while scab lesions are strictly superficial; that the angular lesions of bacterial spot do not cross the larger veins, unlike chemical injury; and that in root rot the tree dies slowly with the above-ground wood alive, the dead roots being found at a depth of 15 to 45 cm.
    • [17] Penn State Extension — Tree Fruit Insect Pest: Green Peach Aphid. Full text. Source for overwintering beneath the bud scales, the migration of the winged forms in June and July, the thresholds of one colony per tree on nectarines and five or more on peaches, and for the species' role as a vector of plum pox.
    • [18] Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food — database of authorised plant protection products. The only valid source for what is permitted on peach in Greece today, at what rate and with what pre-harvest interval. No active substance is proposed in this article; every choice is checked here and on the product label. These authorisations are valid in Greece only.
    • [19] Whidden A. — Peach Scab of Florida Peaches. UF/IFAS Peach Newsletter, Spring 2012, Central Florida Edition. Full text. Source for the size of the first scab lesions (2–3 mm), the yellowish halo, the position near the stem end, the raised corky appearance, and the skin cracking that opens the way for brown rot.
    • [20] Francia C., Lázaro E., Novellón M., Ramón-Albalat A., Beluzán F., Vicent A., Berbegal M., Armengol J. (2025). Biology and epidemiology of Diaporthe amygdali: understanding how environmental factors influence fungal growth, sporulation, infection and lesion development on almond. Frontiers in Plant Science 16:1717223. Full text, open access, peer-reviewed. Source for the current nomenclature of the pathogen, its host range, the entry points (leaf scars in autumn, buds and blossoms in spring), and for the values the same work summarises from earlier studies on peach: conidial germination 5–36 °C with an optimum of 27–29 °C, infection most common at 5–15 °C, incubation of about one month, optimum mycelial growth 24–25 °C, cirrus production 1–38 °C with the greatest proportion at 17 °C and maximum conidium production at 24 °C, and the sinusoidal annual pattern of inoculum peaking in late summer. The experimental results of that work itself (72 hours of wetness, 22 °C for conidium production) concern almond.
    • [21] Choochuen T., Foit J. (2025). Cossid moths (Lepidoptera: Cossidae) as pests of woody plants – A review. Agricultural and Forest Entomology. Full text, open access, peer-reviewed. Source for the twenty-six Cossidae species reported as pests of commercial woody plants, the one- to three-year life cycle with most of it in the larval stage, the host range of Cossus cossus, the honey-combed appearance of infested trunks and the preference of females for already infested areas, the nocturnal habit and low dispersal ability of the adults, wind breakage of scaffolds, and the importance of pheromone traps.
    • [22] Forest Pests — Cossus cossus (goat moth). Full page text. Source for egg-laying in bark cracks in the lower parts of the trunk in groups of 12 to 70, the two-year development with the first year overwintered in the phloem, the size and colour of the mature larva (7 to 10 cm), the gallery 15 mm wide and up to one metre long, the coarse wood chips mixed with frass and the fermenting liquids at the tree foot, and the strong vinegar smell.
    Disclaimer

    Plant protection products are used exclusively according to the authorisations of the Greek Ministry of Rural Development and Food and the instructions on each product label [18]. Those authorisations are valid in Greece only and do not apply in any other country; readers outside Greece must follow their own national registrations. No active substance and no application rate is proposed in this article. The thresholds, temperatures and time windows given are indicative, derive from the literature cited, and do not constitute a recommendation to treat.

    In every case of foliar spraying on trees carrying fruit there is a risk of staining of the fruit and scorching of the foliage. A prior trial on a limited number of trees is required, with the same product and the same rate, and a wait of five to seven days before general application. Spraying is done in the late afternoon or early morning, never during a heatwave and never on foliage under water stress.

    The diagnostic tool is an aid to ranking probabilities and does not constitute a diagnosis. Errors or omissions in the tool's own data cannot be excluded. For regulated harmful organisms, diagnosis and management belong exclusively to the competent plant health authority.

    Every intervention is carried out under the responsibility of the user and following an on-site assessment by a licensed agronomist. Pastopoulos Agronomics bears no liability for the use of the information in this article.

    Related articles

    We use cookies

    Strictly necessary cookies are needed for the site to work. For statistics we need your consent. Details in the Terms of Use and Privacy Policy.