Weather Ελληνικά Sign in
Home › Article

The right soil for growing kiwifruit

Kiwifruit
A kiwifruit orchard on a pergola trellis
Figure 1. A kiwifruit planting is a twenty-year commitment. The block that is chosen does not change afterwards, only what it costs every year changes.

Savvas Pastopoulos, Agronomist, Pastopoulos Agricultural Ltd

The same questions come up before every new kiwifruit planting. Will the block do? Is the soil too heavy? Will the borehole hold up in August? Is it worth spending money on earthworks and drainage, or is that wasted effort? The soil sets the limits, but it does not decide on its own. And there is one point that does not show on paper: blocks that looked marginal on paper have succeeded, provided their owner paid for it and goes on paying every year. This article explains where the limits are, what it costs to get past them, and when the answer really is no.

7.3the maximum
soil pH
2 metresdepth with no
impermeable layer
5 hoursthe root survives
in saturated soil
70 ppmmaximum chloride
in the water

1. Why kiwifruit is so demanding about soil

This is not a quirk. It is anatomy. Kiwifruit combines three characteristics that no other fruit crop has together:

  • The highest root density of any fruit crop, the roots are packed into a small volume of soil and compete with each other for the same oxygen.
  • The smallest air store. The intercellular space of the roots, which acts as a “lung”, accounts for barely 2% of their volume, against 7% to 11% in peach and citrus rootstocks.
  • The highest oxygen consumption. In saturated soil, all the available oxygen is used up within 5 hours [2].

These figures are developed in the article on kiwifruit vine decline syndrome, and they are the background to everything that follows. One thing is worth holding on to: “it needs drainage” does not simply mean that water should not stand. It means that the margin for error is measured in hours.

And the other side of it: kiwifruit is a water-loving species with high water requirements. It asks for a great deal of water and at the same time cannot tolerate water standing. That contradiction is the whole difficulty of the crop.

Sources: 2

2. The limits, in figures

The numerical limits that follow come from a University of California guide [1], that is from soils that are acid to neutral and distinctly less calcareous than Greek ones. Greek reference values for kiwifruit have not been published. The limits are used as a ranking of risk and cost, not as thresholds for excluding a field.

ParameterDesirableTolerance limit
Soil pH6.0 to 6.5Below 7.3 [1]
Total calcium carbonateBelow 3%Below 6%. Above 10% the crop is not worth discussing
Soil electrical conductivityBelow 0.5 dS/m0.75 dS/m [1]
Soil boronnot givenBelow 0.25 ppm [1]
Depth free of an impermeable layerMore than 2 metresA compacted layer at 80 cm is enough to create a problem
Organic matterAbove 2%The lower it is, the greater the investment in organic improvement
Water tablePermanently deepA seasonal rise into the root zone is prohibitive
Calcium carbonate and iron chlorosis The 6% limit is not arbitrary. Kiwifruit is among the species most susceptible to lime-induced chlorosis, and on a heavily calcareous block the crop becomes a permanent battle with chelated iron. The subject is analysed in the article on iron chlorosis. Here one point is enough: the analysis is requested for active calcium carbonate, not only for total. It is the active fraction that does the damage.

3. Soil texture: the most misunderstood criterion

A clarification is needed here, because the conversation has been simplified down to “it needs sandy soil”.

That is not quite right. The data show that kiwifruit performs better on loam and silt loam than on sandy loam [1]. Pure sands bring their own problems: no retention of water or nutrients, heavy nitrogen leaching, and nematodes, which in kiwifruit are a serious matter.

The criterion is not the percentage of sand. It is the structure

  • What the root asks for is aerated pores, that is space filled with air and not with water, throughout its zone.
  • A well-structured loam with stable aggregates and high organic matter aerates better than a structureless sandy loam that has been compacted by machinery.
  • Conversely, a silt with poor drainage is the worst case. Decline cases appear most often on precisely those silty soils with poor drainage, which are extremely prone to waterlogging [3].
  • Compaction from machinery passes turns an acceptable soil into a problem one. It is one of the few factors that get worse over the years inside the planting [3].

Acceptable limits by texture class

The percentages that follow are the limits of the USDA soil texture triangle, as any laboratory reports them on the analysis sheet. The suitability column applies specifically to kiwifruit.

ClassClaySiltSandSuitability for kiwifruit
Loam7 to 27%28 to 50%23 to 52%Ideal. The best combination of aeration and water retention
Silt loam<27%50 to 88%<50%Ideal, on one condition: it requires good structure and proven drainage
Sandy loam<20%<50%43 to 85%Acceptable. Safe as regards aeration, but it requires more frequent irrigation and split fertilisation
Clay loam27 to 40%15 to 53%20 to 45%Marginal. Only with subsurface drainage, planting on ridges and strict control of machinery passes
Silt<12%≥80%<20%High risk. Prone to surface crusting and waterlogging [3]
Sand<10%<15%≥85%High risk. No retention, leaching, nematodes
Clay≥40%<40%<45%Unsuitable without radical engineering intervention

The two figures that matter more than the class

  • Bulk density. As a guide, root growth is seriously restricted above 1.40 g/cm³ in clays, 1.55 g/cm³ in loams and 1.75 g/cm³ in sands. A “good” loam that has been compacted can exceed these limits and behave worse than a mediocre soil in good structure.
  • Infiltration rate. What is wanted is for water to leave the first sixty centimetres within a few hours. If after irrigation or rain the profile stays saturated for more than 24 hours, the block is treated as problematic regardless of what the texture analysis says.

The bulk density and infiltration limits are given as practical orientation indicators. Assessment of a particular block is always made by on-site evaluation and a full soil survey.

So the question is not “how much sand does it have” but “how fast does water leave the first sixty centimetres, and what happens at two metres”. That is answered by the hydrological assessment, not by the texture analysis on its own.

What a hydrological assessment is

The term sounds heavy, but in practice it is not some formal study with official stamps. It is a series of measurements in the field itself, answering one single question: where does the water go when it reaches the block, and how fast. The texture analysis says what the soil consists of. The hydrological assessment says how it behaves.

The difference is critical, because two fields with identical texture analyses can meet entirely different fates, if one has an impermeable layer at one metre and the other does not.

What it has to include

  • Soil pits, not auger samples. Two to three pits 1.5 to 2 metres deep are opened at different points, and the agronomist goes down into them and looks at the profile. That is where the layers, the changes in texture, the roots of the previous crop and the point at which they stopped all become visible.
  • Impermeable layers. Clay pans, a compacted horizon from old ploughing, gravel layers. Such a layer at one metre holds water above it and drowns the root even if the surface is exemplary.
  • The water table and its seasonal variation. One measurement in August is not enough. What matters is where the table rises to in February. Kiwifruit cannot tolerate a table approaching the rhizosphere for long periods.
  • Infiltration test. A pit is filled with water and the time it takes to empty is measured. It is the simplest and at the same time the most revealing test, and it needs no laboratory.
  • History of flooding. If the block has stood under water even once in the last ten years, that carries more weight than any analysis. The information comes from the neighbours.
  • Slope and the water outlet point. Where does the drainage end up? With no receiving outlet, a drainage network solves nothing.

What is wanted is not a folder. It is a clear answer: the water leaves on its own, it leaves with engineering intervention, or it does not leave. In the third case, the question of cultivar and rootstock does not even arise.

4. Water, the criterion that rules out more blocks than the soil does

This is the point most often omitted, and it disqualifies more plantings than the soil itself. Kiwifruit is a salt-sensitive species: an increase in leaf chloride directly reduces the rate of photosynthesis [4]. The limits that follow are those of the Californian guide [1]; bicarbonates in particular are high in many Greek boreholes in calcareous areas, so exceeding the limit does not disqualify the field but makes acidification of the solution and monitoring of the emitters necessary.

Irrigation water parameterMaximum safe limit
Chloride70 ppm
Bicarbonates200 ppm
Sodium50 ppm
Boron0.25 ppm
Electrical conductivity0.75 dS/m

Sources: 1 4

Beyond quality, quantity and reliability also count. Kiwifruit wants irrigation every two days in summer, and in a heatwave more often still. A borehole that runs short in August is not a management problem. It is a reason not to plant.

A detail about the water in this region Where the water is rich in calcium and bicarbonates, irrigation over the canopy leaves white salt deposits on the fruit that ruin its appearance [1]. That is why summer irrigation is applied beneath the canopy, with drippers or microsprinklers. Overhead systems are kept for frost protection.

5. The three analyses before planting

Three analyses are needed before a new planting is established, not one:

  1. Chemical soil analysis: pH, active calcium carbonate, organic matter, conductivity, nutrients, boron.
  2. Physical: texture, bulk density, structure, degree of compaction.
  3. Hydrological: this one is nearly always omitted, and this is the one that shows whether the block will do. Infiltration rate, position and seasonal variation of the water table, presence of impermeable layers in the profile.

And one job that is not an analysis but is worth as much as all three together: opening two or three trenches with an excavator, two metres deep, and examining the profile on site. Colours, layers, signs of hydromorphy, roots of the previous crop. Things become visible that no analysis produces, and the cost is minimal.

6. Dozens of factors beyond the soil

This has to be said plainly, because the article risks being read as though soil were the only criterion. It is not. Soil is a necessary but not a sufficient condition. There are perfect blocks with failed plantings, and the reverse.

CategoryWhat can decide the planting
ClimateChilling hours, spring frost at bud break, extreme winter minima, heatwaves and high VPD in summer, hail
WindOne of the most underestimated. It breaks shoots, scars the fruit, keeps the bees away. According to the Californian guide, every broken cane is four to six fruit fewer [1]; the number depends on the cultivar and the crop load
PollinationRatio and distribution of males, synchrony of bloom, availability and activity of bees, rain during flowering
Plant healthPsa pressure in the area, esca, nematodes, Armillaria, the history of the block
Genetic materialCultivar, rootstock, health and size of the young plants
ManagementPruning, crop load, support system, discipline in irrigation, avoidance of compaction
EconomicsCapital for the first four non-productive years, availability of labour, access to a packhouse and cold storage

The list is not exhaustive, and that is precisely the point. No table replaces an on-site assessment. Two blocks with identical analyses, one in a gully and the other in open ground exposed to the north wind, are not the same block.

7. Marginal blocks, what is actually needed

And now the substantive part, because most growers do not choose a block. they have a block.

The good news is documented. Kiwifruit performs excellently on first-class soils, but “good and occasionally excellent production is also achieved on second-class soils, provided management is correct” [1]. That is not consolation; it is an observation from regions with decades of experience.

What “correct management” means on a marginal block

  • Ridges. Planting on raised rows lifts the root zone above the critical layer. It is the basic tool on heavy soils.
  • Subsoil aeration and breaking of impermeable layers before planting, with deep ploughing or a subsoiler. It is done once, properly, with dry soil. After planting it is never done again.
  • A drainage network. Open ditches or subsurface pipes with a clear outlet. Without an outlet, drainage is decorative.
  • Organic matter, systematically and permanently. It is not a luxury: it acts directly on structure and on hydraulic conductivity. On a marginal soil it is the one parameter that genuinely improves over the years.
  • Discipline in irrigation. Small, frequent doses. Moisture sensors instead of a hand in the soil. On a marginal block over-irrigation kills faster than drought.
  • Minimising machinery passes, particularly on wet soil, with fixed traffic lanes.
  • Rootstock. Actinidia genotypes with waterlogging tolerance are being trialled, and differences between rootstocks in their behaviour under excessive moisture do exist [5] [6]. It is a field that is developing, and what is available at the moment of planting is checked then.
The honest warning

The measures above substantially improve the odds. They give no guarantee. Cases of kiwifruit decline have been recorded on well-drained soils where waterlogging is rare, and in plantings that had been established on ridges [3].

That does not mean the measures are not worth it. It means they should not be presented as insurance. The syndrome is a problem of soil, water and microclimate together, and the pathogens come second.

8. What the effort really costs

The cost of establishing a new kiwifruit planting is of the order of 60,000 to 70,000 euros per hectare, and about four years are needed to the first commercial crop. On a marginal block, the earthworks, the drainage and the continuous organic improvement are added on top of that.

But that is not the real cost. The real cost is something that does not go into a budget:

On a marginal block there is no right to make a mistake

On a deep, well-drained soil, one excessive irrigation in August is a mistake without consequences. On a heavy soil, with the five-hour rule in force, the same mistake can start the process that will cost vines.

The requirements of kiwifruit do not change according to the block. What changes is how dearly every deviation is paid for, and the fact that the management has to be right every year, for twenty years.

That is why the decision about a marginal block is not only agronomic. It is also a question of whether the time, the willingness and the tools exist to monitor it at that intensity.

9. When the answer is no

There are situations in which no amount of effort offsets the risk. They are not many, but they are clear:

  • A water table that rises seasonally into the root zone. Saturated soils kill vines at any time of year [1], and the problem is not solved with ridges when the water comes from below.
  • Irrigation water outside the limits for chloride or sodium, with no alternative source. It cannot be corrected.
  • A block in a frost-prone position, a low point, a closed basin, stagnant cold air in spring.
  • Strongly calcareous soil, above 10% calcium carbonate.
  • An inadequate or unreliable quantity of water at the peak of summer.
One practical piece of advice worth more than any analysis Before the decision, the best source is the neighbouring plantings. If there are kiwifruit blocks in the same zone and on the same water, the visit is made in August, not in May, when everything looks fine. And a conversation with their owners about what gave them trouble is the cheapest and most reliable information there is; no laboratory provides it.

10. Sources

The numbers in the text refer to the list below.

Related articles Kiwifruit vine decline syndrome for root physiology and water management, the annual cultural operations in kiwifruit for the yearly cycle, bacterial canker (Psa) and esca of kiwifruit for plant health, and iron chlorosis for calcareous soils.
Disclaimer

The limits and values given are indicative, they come from the international literature and they do not constitute individual agronomic advice. The suitability of a particular block is judged only after full soil and water analyses and an on-site assessment by a licensed agronomist, who will also weigh the dozens of factors beyond the soil.

Establishing a perennial planting is a twenty-year investment of substantial capital. Every decision is taken at the user's own responsibility. Pastopoulos Agricultural Ltd accepts no liability for any damage arising from the use of the information in this text.

Related articles

Training kiwifruit: T-bar and pergola

Training kiwifruit: T-bar and pergola

The architecture of the kiwifruit vine and why both training systems follow from it. T-bar and pergola with their dimensions, advantages, costs and a comparison in numbers. Training from the day of planting: planting high, a first season for the root with tipping at one metre, cutting back low the following spring and taking the trunk up in the second season, leaders, winter and summer pruning, males and the support structure. Three diagrams, a table of mistakes, and the gaps that remain for Greece. A field observation from Giannitsa on planting distances.

Kiwifruit Pruning